Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits Can be Challenging

Transvaginal mesh and bladder slings are used in more than 100,000 procedures each year. Most commonly, they are used to provide support for damaged or weakened tissue after surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, these meshes have been linked with some life threatening complications and have been found to be defective or at times improperly implanted.

Transvaginal mesh and bladder slings are used when patients experience pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI). POP is a very common condition in women, especially for those who have gone through natural childbirth. The strain of childbirth can cause certain organs to prolapse, or drop from their actual position.

SUI is a serious condition in which physical activity or movement, ranging from sneezing to heavy lifting, puts pressure on the bladder and leads to an involuntary loss of urine. This condition is mostly seen in older women and women who have given birth.

Synthetic mesh can cause many various problems and in some cases it can puncture or “perforate” the surrounding organs and tissue, including the bladder, uterus, or bowel. They can also migrate, causing damage in the neighboring parts of the body. Other common problems include but not limited to:

•    Adhesion (formation of scar tissue)

•    Blockage of the small and/or large intestine

•    Bacterial infection

•    Pain during sex

•    General pain in the abdominal region

•    Recurrence of POP or SUI

•    Build-up of fluid at the site of the surgery

The companies which have been named in the transvaginal mesh lawsuits include:

•    Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson

•    Boston Scientific

•    Bard

•    American Medical Systems (AMS)

Women who filed the mesh lawsuits generally claim that mesh manufacturers:

•    Did not do enough research to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the products

•    There were no well controlled studies of the products prior to marketing

•    Provided insufficient warnings of potential mesh complications

•    Intentionally confused the public into accepting that mesh is safe and effective

•    Negligently designed and manufactured mesh products

If you’ve been seriously injured, get in touch with the complications of vmsettlements.net. Visit http://vmsettlements.net/ to find out more about how to file the lawsuit and claim for the compensation.

Being Updated About the TVM Complications

Many American women have been reported to suffer due to faulty transvaginal mesh (TVM). Injuries caused by a mesh product can be painful and expensive, and the victims might be eligible for filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits and sue the TVM’s negligent manufacturer.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2011 issued a notification stating and warning about the problems with surgical mesh products to the doctors and patients. It said that “serious complications associated with surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP (pelvic organ prolapse) are not rare”.

The agency received more than a thousand reports of adverse events concerning the mesh to treat POP and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from 2005 and 2007 but the number almost tripled in the following three years.

Get Updates on Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits - Vmsettlements.net

Transvaginal mesh is supposed to solve problems, include pelvic organ prolapse, or POP and stress urinary incontinence, or SUI. However, there have been several defects in some transvaginal meshes that added up to the following complications:

•    Dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse)

•    Chronic infection of the vagina

•    Lower back pain

•    Bleeding of the vagina

•    Perforation of organs

•    Infection

•    Death

Product Defects
Injuries arise from a defectively designed mesh and the condition is called mesh erosion. The medical device erodes into or possibly even through the walls of the rectum, small intestine, vagina, or bladder and can lead to stool leakage or infection. Organs can be exposed to severe infection, necessitating surgery when the break down is too much. Bard Avaulta Solo, Johnson & Johnson, Avaulta Biosynthetic Systems, and Avaulta Plus are some of the names that have been filed in the lawsuits.

Women who are aware of the transvaginal mesh lawsuit update normally allege the following about mesh manufacturers:

•    Failed in their duty to ensure the safety and efficiency of the TVMs

•    Did not conduct sufficient and well controlled studies before marketing

•    Provided little warnings of potential mesh complications and patient harm

•    Intentionally misled the public with wrong advertisement and branding about the safety

•    Was negligent about the design and manufacturing of the mesh products

If you experienced transvaginal mesh complications, you may qualify for a lawsuit which can help you recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages (past and future), and pain and suffering. Visit http://vmsettlements.net/ to know more.